CO129-395 - Public Offices - 1912 — Page 132

130

.0 I NOT

Cl %om dagrice vens

-I SWOTO, TM TASO

trovat pemeedao row to dqi9ostT KWо od quo I

oddenspio daldina edo to dosyast ni drøtent dit de to

"yod TemIST" DOS "status" xsen obeto a'ynoqntoo

ofimieɔst aA beaofone Nelwered toy qnibrea nu I

ENTRI OWC evoda odt to fore

3 64% to moldexdateer tot moldsoligÿs SNT

I tans otts nooa bre dual dJSI redoduŬ no beIIT STEW

end warbitiw od 90t110 JnedT sad yd nog bolias eewW

dobiv vhsetT eRomsqst-cinoA erit Jadt bortorg en no emsa

VOL TOVOD don avob demi NOTI Virb no sotot ofni eneo

3009tdra deitita on Jent exor.nedd

Geimolos falttä

noidoodong and exovnt пso,пOjJw:0чTOS TO NOSTOg Cerndon

८

.neqBb, MI AWBI 98 XTM aberThandel ed: to

no Xosa de 679w.aroltwoligge sde nonT

deal brs redmevoй

Shurd oft vtisoflib svode sdd to Copompeanoo mI

005300T moiToRA Neteind unt yd savo noxed erew adlTSID

delviva odt to vragmos rejala srit si doldwyneymoo

noiterteiger tot botiqqs Tejdsl edt br

t

thereof on January 11th, the marks being decided to be

patentable on the 1st instant. So I think there will be

no more necessity to push the British Cigarette Com-

pany's applications ahead, for the double reason that

no further legal step can be taken and that if applied

for their registration again the British American

Tobacco's Company's registration of the identical marks

will absolutely prevent the new applications from being

granted.

The above two marks are the only cases which were

not accepted by the Patent Office owing to the revised

Treaty. The Company sent me some more marks for regis-

tration, but I have not taken them up, because I could

not see any chance for same.

Hoping that the above explanation will be sufficient

for your purpose,

(Signed)

I remain &c.,

S.Kishi.

pl